01. Subject pronoun. ''A'' means ''eu'' in Romanian, ''I'' in English.
02. Verb. ''iabiaa'' = Romanian ''a iubi''.
03. Object pronoun. Egyptian ''tu'' or '''te'' corresponds to Romanian ''tu'' or ''te'' .
The
construction of the sentence follows a similar Subject-Verb-Object
(SVO) order. Both languages may omit the Subject pronoun.
Egyptian infinitive ''iabiaa'''(double A) is strikingly similar to Romanian infinitive ''a iubi''.
The grammatical structure and the use of similar words highlight the connections between the two languages
''labia tu'' is identical to Romanian ''te iubesc'' - both omit the subject ''A'' = ''eu''.
In Ancient Egyptian, ''"sa da"'' or ''"sa ded'' can be understood as
forms of the verb "to give," with "sa" potentially serving as a prefix
or particle.
- In Romanian, *''sa dau"'' (I give) or ''"sa dam'' (we
give) shows how the verb "a da" (to give) is conjugated with suffixes
to indicate the subject.
1. ''"Bea'' (to drink) in Romanian and ''"be'' in Ancient Egyptian.
2. ''Ded'' (to give) in Ancient Egyptian and ''dat (gave) în Romanian.
3. ''Iabiaa'' (to love) in Ancient Egyptian and ''a iubi'' (to love) în Romanian.
reflexive voice ''sa ded'' = Romanian ''sa dam'' or ''sa dau'', ''sa
dea'' is unique and is identical in both languages. It is formed with
''sa + verb''
1. In Ancient Egyptian
-''"sa ded;;* can be understood as a
reflexive or causative form, where "sa" serves as a particle that
modifies the verb "ded" (to give).
2. In Romanian
- ''"să dau"''(I give) or ''să dăm'' (we
give) uses "să" as a particle that precedes the verb "a da" (to give),
indicating intention or purpose.
"Egyptian ''sa be'' = Romanian ''sa bea'' Egyptian ''sa ded'' = Romanian
''sa dea'' They are identical structures with identical meanings.
1. ''Sa be'' in Ancient Egyptian corresponds to ''să bea''* in
Romanian, both meaning "to drink" in a reflexive or intentional sense.
2.
''Sa ded'' in Ancient Egyptian corresponds to ''să dea'' în Romanian,
both meaning "to give" in a similar reflexive or intentional
conte
Noun + adjective order is identical - noun + adjective:
Ham FRE = om frumos.
Noun - adjective agreement in gender and number
HAM FRE = om frumos. Humphrey (the name).
HAMAT FREAT or FRAT = femeie frumoasa.
in ancient Egyptian, the feminine form of adjectives involves
adding the suffix ''at'' (or '''-t) to agree with the noun.
Vocabulary.
iabiaa = a iubi (to love)
ded = a da (to give)
sa ded = sa dea (to give)
beaa (infinitive form) = a bea (to drink)
Asare > soare (sun)
The
Romanian word "moasă," which refers to a midwife or someone who assists
in childbirth, does indeed have a linguistic link to the ancient
Egyptian word "ms" (or "mes"), which means "to give birth" or "to bear a
child."
The ancient Egyptian word "ḥrḏ" (heredi) is often associated with
concepts of lineage or descendants, which aligns with the idea of
"children" and can indeed be linked to the concept of "hereditary" in
various European languages.
the bee symbol is read BEE, like in English and they mean the same thing.
It
is from root ''bee'' that the word bee-at in Egyptian was formed,
which is wrongly transliterared as ''bity''. It is ''bee-at'' and it is
the root for ''baiat'' in Romanian and ''boy'' in English.
''nswt bity'' is correctly transliterated as ''an sat bee-at''.
Egyptian and Romanian ''mama'' and ''tata'' (mama, mother and ''father'').
English father is derived from PATRE (Cancer, RAC/Rok) > pater > father.
In ancient Egyptian, "kʷn" (often transliterated as "caana") can refer
to a type of vessel or container, while in Romanian, "cană" means "cup"
or "mug."
aed = aud (to hear).
aedat = udat (wet)
''MAT MAT'' is a dual plural in Egypt. It became ''matematica'' or ''Mathematics''. Suffix ''-ic'' = diminutive suffix.
''Te
re te re'' is dual plural, compound from ''te'' = land, territory, and
Ra (Light, Matria). Tere tere became teritoriu, territory.
Ka Mat =the energy of MAT. It became ''chimia'', chemistry.
iris in Egyptian = iris in Romanian = iris in English (the flower).
t is likely that Freyr became Florin, derived from ''floare''
''flower'', which, for some reason, has its root in FRE *beautiful in
Europe and Egypt)
FAIR in English = honest, white, light in colour, beautiful, good. FRE
(not nfr) in Egyptian has identical meaning. FRE > FAIR. FRE > FRU
(the root for ''frumoasa'', ''frumos'' in Romanian)
Since
the founding population of Egypt migrated there c 32000 years ago (Mat
Hat, Mehit is the founder of Egypt, the 8th Age of Mat = Orion conjunct
Aries 0), it implies that Egyptian language was already formed, since it
shares so many common points to Romanian (but also English, via the
Saka > Saxon connection).
MATRIA became ''mother'', ''mutter'', ''madre'' (Spanish and Italian), etc etc.
MAMA and MAT in Egyptian.
MAMA in Romanian.
''MAT'' in Slavic languages.
MATRIA (the name) became mother, mutter, madre (Spanish, Italian). MAT
MAT > MA MA in Egyptian and Romanian. Mat in Slavic languages. All
European languages use MAT to form the word mother. That includes
Egyptian.
MAT in European languages is the root for the word mother.. Which means it comes from a unified civilisation. Egyptian also
used MAT or AMAT for ''mother''.
One would ask ''How is that possible''?
Migration at the beginning of Ice Age (Sekhmet turning into Hat Hera
> Hathor, c 32kya). YDNA R1b is prevalent in Egyptian males (mummies
over 2400 years old, when no influx of sub Saharan or Asian genes are
detected in tested mummies) originates for sure, without doubt, from
the area around the Black Sea. Romania is there. So is Anatolia, where
names such as ''Sakarya River''(Saka RIA) and Cappadocia (Capat Dacia)
exist.
We do have a massive amount of evidence
to support a link between Egypt and Anatolia. However, Egypt predates
Anatolia, since we do have proper references for when it was founded -
MAT HAT, or Mehit, meaning the 8th Age of Mat = Orion conjunct Aries 0.
Since
''Tut''s pectoral with Sekhmet and Ptah depict a clear opposition
between signs (Sekhmet is Orion conjunct the vulture, Ptah is Cancer
conjunct Capricorn), and a king of Egypt is clearly depicted - it means
Egypt already existed c 13000 years ago - which is what the pectoral
indicates as timeline.
Egyptian PARAT > Romanian PALAT, English PALACE.
3
ATREI/ATRI (the living one/s), Romanian ''a trai'' (to live), the TREE
of Life = derived from 3 in astrology, the 3rd zodiac sign = Orion
(Terra's Gemini).
RA MANAT = Ra eternal (manat is feminine in form) > RAMANA > lumina in Romanian (light).
Caraiman
is from ''ka'' = energy, Raman = Light, so the energy of Light, or
Matria (and not the false etymology that is absolutely ridiculous. Turks
were not even in that area and to imply Romanians did not have names
for their most important locations is absolutely ludicrous. They did not
wait to be invaded by hostile, primitive forces to name their most
important landmarks.
Update:
Romanian has internal inflection, while Italian has external inflection
for articles. Egyptian also has internal inflection, similar to
Romanian. It features a definite article + plural construction, which
results in a plural form that is considered a dual plural with the
suffix '-iii,' or even a plural in three with '-iii.' Romanian also has
this feature, and one notable expression that contains both plurals is
'viii cu viii, morții cu morții' (the living with the living, the dead
with the dead).
See alsoverb ''ded'' comparison https://m4tri4.blogspot.com/2025/04/how-do-you-say-in-romance-languages.html
Update:
deba (or so in Egyptian) DEVA in Romanian, both meaning city/town/settlement.
dbꜣ.t (pronounced deba / teba) = fortified city, settlement, townLater Coptic: TABA / TOBA = walled cityHieroglyphs: brick wall determinative 
+ place sign
The Dacian “dava” towns (over 100 attested: Potaissa-dava, Argedava, Zargidava, etc.)
The statistical probability of this being a coincidence is effectively zero. When you move beyond isolated words and find identical syntactic structures and verb conjugations, you are looking at the same "software" running on two different historical "hardwares."
The Plurality Code: The "ii" and "iii"
The "VIII cu VIII" (8 with 8):
This mirrors the ancient Egyptian "Ogdoad" (the 8 primordial deities).
In Romanian, the phrasing of "mortii cu mortii" (the dead with the dead)
follows the exact rhyming-repetitive grammatical structure used in the Pyramid Texts to maintain cosmic balance (Ma'at).
- Romanian: A fi (To be), Să fie (Let it be).
- Egyptian: S-f (to cause to be/to make).
Egyptian: ''an mare am sa....'' = Romanian '' in mare am sa'' = ''generally, I will..'' It expresses future intent.